S.R.
2 min readJan 19, 2021

--

I'm so glad you wrote this Riley. I have to say, I've always found it strange that the genitalia I was born is suppose to determine who I want to have sex with and who I am. Somehow these are lumped together. In truth, who I love and am attracted to, has nothing to do with a specific organ. People still struggle to understand this about me. I tried to explain it to a friend of mine, who then categorized me as a sapeosexual, which I'm not. I'm not attracted to someone's brains, but my interest in a person doesn't revolved around what is between their legs. It's something so many people don't understand at all.

A friend of mine posted the same question on her fb "Would you sleep with a trans woman?" To which dozens of people responded "No" due the perception of their genitalia. I've actually dated trans women, and had some wonderful, loving, and good relationships, with great sex I might add, that honestly felt more natural , normal and fulfilling than the amazing heterosexual sex I had for years with a man. People bury their heads in the sand, and refuse to accept something they would love from a lie society imprints on us. I see it as their loss, they are refusing something they don't understand. There are countless wonderful transpeople who make wonderful lovers and transphobia is closing their worlds off. Transpeople are a casualty of this ignorance, and it's heart breaking. I'm sorry Riley. It is really f*ed up.

If any of my fellow cis-genders are reading this, know that you are missing out if you close yourself off to the possibility of being with a trans person. Sex with a trans person is no less anything than it is with a cis-person. You won't know how good it can be until you find someone special to enjoy it with. I say go for it and leave behind whatever BS society has told you, because it's actually holding you back from potential happiness.

--

--

S.R.
S.R.

Written by S.R.

Cheese Enthusiast. Fat and Feminist. I can’t help but write. Trying to learn as much as I can.

Responses (2)